Information Letter of the Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court from 9 July 2013 № 158 “A Survey of Court Practice on Certain Issues Connected with the Consideration by Commercial Courts of Cases with Participation of Foreign Persons”
- Court:
- Supreme Commercial Court
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 9 July 2013 № 18-П on the review of constitutionality of provisions of paragraphs 1, 5 and 6 of Article 152 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation in connection with the complaint of citizen Krylov
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- The constitutionality of rules which deprive a citizen of the right to demand in court proceedings the removal of defamatory information from a web site and exclude the liability of the web site administrator (or owner) for its dissemination.
Subject areas:
Decree of the Plenary Session of the Supreme Court of 9 July 2013 № 24 “On the Court Practice on Bribery Cases and Other Corruption Crimes”
- Court:
- Supreme Court
Subject areas:
Review of court practice of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation for the first quarter of the year 2013 (affirmed by the Presidium of the Supreme Court on 3 July 2013)
- Court:
- Supreme Court
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Plenary Session of the Supreme Commercial Court of 30 July 2013 № 56 “On Making an Addition to the Judgment of the Plenary Session of the Supreme Commercial Court of the Russian Federation of 23.12.2010 № 63 “On Certain Issues Connected with the Application of Chapter III.1 of the Federal law “On Insolvency (Bankruptcy)”
- Court:
- Supreme Commercial Court
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Plenary Session of the Supreme Commercial Court of 2 July 2013 № 50 “On Making Changes to the Judgment of the Plenary Session of the Supreme Commercial Court of the Russian Federation of 8 October 2012 № 60 “On Certain Questions Arising in Connection with the Creation of Court for Intellectual Property Rights within the System of Commercial Courts”
- Court:
- Supreme Commercial Court
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 2 July 2013 № 16-П on the review of constitutionality of provisions of part one of Article 237 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation in connection with the complaint of B.Gadaev and the request of Kurgan Regional Court
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- The right of a court – either at its own initiative or upon the motion of the victim of crime - to remand a criminal case to the prosecutors for the purposes of removing obstacles to its judicial consideration in the event when facts testify to the commission by the accused of a more grave crime than he was actually indicted for by the prosecutors.
- Dissenting opinion:
- Kazantsev Sergey
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 2 July 2013 № 17-П on the review of constitutionality of the provisions of paragraph 1, Article 5, and Article 391of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation in connection with the complaint of Open Joint-Stock Company “Omskmashina”
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- The constitutionality of the procedure for entering into force of normative acts concerning the calculation of cadastre value of land plots, in the light of the fact that such acts may affect the obligations of the payers of the land tax, but at the same time they enter into force otherwise than in the special procedure for tax legislation entering into force.
Subject areas:
Decree of the Plenary Session of the Supreme Court of 27 June 2013 № 20 “On the Application by Courts of Legislation on Voluntary Insurance of Property of Citizens”
- Court:
- Supreme Court
Subject areas:
Decree of the Plenary Session of the Supreme Court of 27 June 2013 № 19 “On the Application by Courts of the Legislation Regulating the Grounds and Procedure for Exoneration from Criminal Liability”
- Court:
- Supreme Court
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 27 June 2013 № 15-П on the review of constitutionality of provisions of parts 3 and 10 of Article 40 of the Federal law “On the General Principles of Organisation of Local Self-Government in the Russian Federation” and paragraph 3 of part one of Article 83 of the Labour Code of the Russian Federation in connection with the complaint of citizen Dubkov
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- Constitutionality of the regulation which precludes the reinstatement of a dismissed head of municipality in his office on the ground that prior to the end of judicial proceedings a new head of municipality has been elected
Subject areas:
Decree of the Plenary Session of the Supreme Court of 27 June 2013 № 21 “On the Application by Courts of General Jurisdiction of the Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms from 4 November 1950 and the Protocols Thereto”
- Court:
- Supreme Court
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 25 June 2013 № 14-П on the review of constitutionality of part 1 of Article 1, paragraph 1 of part 1, parts 6 and 7 of Article 3 of the Federal law “On Compensation for the violation of the Right to Court Examination Within a Reasonable Term or the Right to Execution of Judicial Act Within a Reasonable Term”, parts 1 and 4 of Article 2441 and paragraph 1 of part 1 of Article 2446 of the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation upon the complaint of citizen Popova
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- The constitutionality of rules which preclude the victim of crime from having recourse to court with the demand to award compensation for the violation of his right to criminal proceedings within a reasonable term, if as a result of criminal investigation instituted upon his application the suspects and the accused were not identified.
- Dissenting opinion:
- Zhilin Gennadiy
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 17 June 2013 № 13-П on the review of constitutionality of part 2 of Article 2 of the Federal law of 23 December 2010 № 360-ФЗ “On Making Changes in the Federal Law “On the Additional Social Security of the Members of the Flying Crews of Civil Aviation Aircrafts” in connection with the requests from commercial courts of Sakhalin Region and Primorskiy Krai
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- The constitutionality of the disputed rule, as long as the change introduced by it (namely, the removal of a limit on the amount of payments and remunerations on the basis of which the contributions for an addition to aviators’ pensions were calculated and exacted) was given retroactive force.
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of 18 June 2013 № 17630/12 in the case The company “Veststroy” et al. vs The company “Sadovo-Spasskoe” et al.
- Court:
- Supreme Commercial Court
- From which moment the period of limitation should run in case of an unauthorised construction, given that the object of construction has yet been registered in the State Register?
Subject areas:
Have you spotted a typo?
Highlight it, click Ctrl+Enter and send us a message. Thank you for your help!
To be used only for spelling or punctuation mistakes.