Ruling of the Supreme Court Judicial Division for Economic Disputes of 20 February 2017 № 306-ЭС16-16518
- Court:
- Supreme Court
- Whether the procurator (public prosecutor), when applying to a court in the interest of an uncertain class of persons, should use the mandatory extrajudicial dispute settlement procedure before?
Subject areas:
Review of court practice of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation № 1 for the year 2017 (affirmed by the Presidium of the Supreme Court on 16 February 2017)
- Court:
- Supreme Court
Subject areas:
Review of practice of consideration by courts of cases involving the application of certain provisions of Section V1 and Article 269 of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation (affirmed by the Presidium of the Supreme Court of 16 February 2017)
- Court:
- Supreme Court
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 10 February 2017 № 2-П upon the petition of the citizen I. Dadin
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- The constitutionality of the criminal prosecution for a violation of the procedure for conducting meetings, assemblies, manifestations and picketing, given that the accused has already been repeatedly (more than twice within 180 days) brought to administrative responsibility.
Subject areas:
Ruling of the Supreme Court Judicial Division for Economic Disputes of 9 February 2017 № 305-КГ16-15387
- Court:
- Supreme Court
- Whether a company may be allowed to take part in a government tender (in the form of request for quotation), if it offers zero price (0.00 RUR)?
Subject areas:
Ruling of the Supreme Court Judicial Division for Economic Disputes of 30 January 2017 № 305-ЭС16-14210
- Court:
- Supreme Court
- Whether supplier may demand that the customer performs the contractual obligation to provide bank guarantee from a bank?
Subject areas:
Ruling of the Constitutional Court of 26 January 2017 № 203-О on the refusal to admit for consideration the petition of the All-Russian Social Organisation of Disabled Persons – Russian Association of Blind Students and Professionals
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- Whether the Association may challenge in the Constitutional Court the decision of the Central Electoral Commission prohibiting the signing of subscription lists by means of digital signature or facsimile
- Dissenting opinion:
- Bondar Nikolay , Kokotov Aleksandr
Subject areas:
Ruling of the Supreme Court Judicial Division for Economic Disputes of 31 January 2017 № 309-КГ16-13100
- Court:
- Supreme Court
- Whether the transfer of property under accord and satisfaction agreement terminating the contract of loan would be subject to VAT taxation?
Subject areas:
Ruling of the Supreme Court Judicial Division for Economic Disputes of 24 January 2017 № 310-ЭС16-14179
- Court:
- Supreme Court
- Whether good-faith mortgage lender may demand that the mortgaged property (a flat) be foreclosed – in the context of legal relations arising before 1 July 2014?
Subject areas:
Ruling of the Supreme Court Judicial Division for Economic Disputes of 24 January 2017 № 305-КГ16-10570
- Court:
- Supreme Court
- Whether the owner of all apartments in a residential house must register his right of ownership to it as a single object of real estate, if he wants to demolish the house and register his right of ownership to the land under it?
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of 19 January 2017 № 1-П regarding the constitutionality of execution of the European Court of Human Rights judgment of 31 July 2014 in the case “OAO Neftyanaya kompaniya "YUKOS" vs Russia”
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- The constitutional feasibility of execution of the European Court of Human Rights judgment – to the extent it puts Russia under obligation to pay €1.87 billion to former shareholders of “Yukos” by way of compensation for unlawfully levying tax penalties for the years 2000 and 2001 and execution fees.
- Dissenting opinion:
- Yaroslavtsev Vladimir , Aranovskiy Konstantin
Subject areas:
Ruling of the Supreme Court Judicial Division for Economic Disputes of 19 January 2017 № 305-ЭС15-15704
- Court:
- Supreme Court
- What is the relation between paragraphs 1 and 2 of Article 1107 of Civil Code, that is, between the requirement to compensate all profits received as a result of unjust enrichment, and the requirement to pay interest under Article 395, Civil Code for the use of monies belonging to another person?
Subject areas:
Ruling of the Constitutional Court of 15 September 2016 № 1742-О
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- Dissenting opinion:
- Gadzhiev Gadis
Ruling of the Constitutional Court of 7 July 2016 № 1358-О
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- Dissenting opinion:
- Aranovskiy Konstantin , Knyazev Sergey
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 5 July 2016 № 15-П
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- Dissenting opinion:
- Aranovskiy Konstantin
Have you spotted a typo?
Highlight it, click Ctrl+Enter and send us a message. Thank you for your help!
To be used only for spelling or punctuation mistakes.