Ruling of the Supreme Court Judicial Division for Economic Disputes of 24 January 2017 № 305-КГ16-10570
- Court:
- Supreme Court
- Whether the owner of all apartments in a residential house must register his right of ownership to it as a single object of real estate, if he wants to demolish the house and register his right of ownership to the land under it?
Subject areas:
Review of court practice of the Supreme Court for 2015 № 2 (affirmed by the Presidium of the Supreme Court on 26 June 2015)
- Court:
- Supreme Court
Subject areas:
Review of court practice of the Supreme Court for 2015 № 1 (affirmed by the Presidium of the Supreme Court on 4 March 2015)
- Court:
- Supreme Court
Subject areas:
Ruling of the Constitutional Court of 3 July 2014 № 1555-О on the refusal to admit to consideration the petition of the LLC “Vozrozhdenie” against the violation of its constitutional rights and freedoms by a provision of paragraph 1 of Article 391 of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- The constitutionality of the rule which does not allow, in case of equating the cadastre value of land with its market value for tax purposes, to extend the resultant market assessment of land to previous tax periods
- Dissenting opinion:
- Aranovskiy Konstantin
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 22 April 2014 № 12-П on the review of constitutionality of paragraphs 2–6 of Article 13 of the Federal law “On the Circulation of Lands of Agricultural Destination” upon the petition of citizens V.Gerasimenko and L.Gerasimenko
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- The constitutionality of provisions which deprive the owner of a share in an agricultural land plot of the possibility to independently determine the location of the parcel of land which was apportioned to him in kind in exchange for his share
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 2 July 2013 № 17-П on the review of constitutionality of the provisions of paragraph 1, Article 5, and Article 391of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation in connection with the complaint of Open Joint-Stock Company “Omskmashina”
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- The constitutionality of the procedure for entering into force of normative acts concerning the calculation of cadastre value of land plots, in the light of the fact that such acts may affect the obligations of the payers of the land tax, but at the same time they enter into force otherwise than in the special procedure for tax legislation entering into force.
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of 28 May 2013 № 17085/12 in the case Administration of Temriuk district vs Mikhail Radzievski, an entrepreneur
- Court:
- Supreme Commercial Court
- Points of law: 1) whether buildings and structures erected by the owner of land plot, but not registered by him in the State Register of Rights to Immovables (hereinafter: the Register), may be considered as his property? 2) whether a football pitch situated on a land plot is a separate object of real estate, the right to which may be registered? 3) may a court give its own qualification to an object, which has been registered as a real estate? 4) under which circumstances a lease-holder of a land plot may acquire the right of ownership to objects erected by him on this land plot?
Subject areas:
The Information Letter of the Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of 15 January 2013 № 153 “A Survey of Court Practice on Certain Issues Regarding the Protection of Owner’s Rights Against Breaches Not Entailing Dispossession”
- Court:
- Supreme Commercial Court
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of 1 December 2011 № 9987/11 in the case Administration of Cheliabinsk City et al. vs The Federal Agency for the Management of State Property et al.
- Court:
- Supreme Commercial Court
- Point of law: whether the land plots constituting a federal property may be compulsorily withdrawn for the needs of a municipality?
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of 1 November 2011 № 7088/11 in the case The company "Aren" vs The Federal Service for State Registration, Cadastre and Cartography in Penza Region
- Court:
- Supreme Commercial Court
- Point of law: whether the consent of the seller of a real estate item (an edifice) to divide the land plot for the purpose of forming the land plot necessary for the use of the real estate is required, or such consent is not needed and the right to lease such land arises in the purchaser by virtue of the law?
Subject areas:
Have you spotted a typo?
Highlight it, click Ctrl+Enter and send us a message. Thank you for your help!
To be used only for spelling or punctuation mistakes.