• A
  • A
  • A
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Regular version of the site
Search

Judgment of the Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of 15 July 2014 № 5467/14  in the case The Department  of the Ministry of Interior for Rostov Region vs The Company “Real Estate” 

Whether penalty in case of partial failure to perform a government contract should be calculated based on the total price of the contract or with due regard to contractor’s partial performance of his obligations?

Decision of the Supreme Commercial Court of 17 June 2014 № ВАС-7907/2013 upon the petition of the company “Argus-Spektr” 

The legality of the Federal Antimonopoly Service guidelines, on which basis the unannounced antitrust inspections (or “dawn raids”) are conducted

Judgment of the Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of 4 February 2014 № 9189/13 in the case KAO Corporation vs The company “Markos”

1) whether compensation for the unlawful use of a trademark may be regarded as a penalty? 2) whether plaintiff’s expenses for court fee must be reimbursed to him in accordance with the amount of compensation he claimed for violation of his right to the trademark or in accordance with the amount that was actually awarded by the court?

 

Have you spotted a typo?
Highlight it, click Ctrl+Enter and send us a message. Thank you for your help!
To be used only for spelling or punctuation mistakes.