Decree of the Plenary Session of the Supreme Commercial Court of 16 May 2014 № 28 “On Certain Questions Related to Contestation of Large-Scale Transactions and Interested Transactions”
- Court:
- Supreme Commercial Court
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 25 February 2014 № 4-П on the review of constitutionality of certain provisions of Articles 7.3, 9.1, 14.43, 15.19, 15.23-1 и 19.7-3 of the Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offences in connection with the request of the Commercial Court of Niznii Novgorod Region and petitions of a number of legal entities
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- The constitutionality of provisions which preclude imposing upon legal entities a fine which amount would be lower than the minimal level provided for in the Code
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 21 February 2014 № 3-П on the review of constitutionality of paragraph 1 of Article 19 of the Federal law “On Limited Liability Companies” upon the petition of the limited liability company “Firma Reiting”
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- The constitutionality of the contested provision, as soon as it enables one or several members of the company, who disagree with the decision of the general meeting of company’s shareholders to increase its charter capital, to obstruct this decision by way of refusal from or delay in contributing their part of additional capital.
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of 21 January 2014 № 9913/13 in the case Samvel Sargisian et al. vs The company “Treasury Island” et al.
- Court:
- Supreme Commercial Court
- What actions of a spouse with regard to the shares in a company, in which he is a member, may be regarded as a disposal of common property of spouses?
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Plenary Session of the Supreme Commercial Court of 30 July 2013 № 62 “On Certain Issues of Compensation of Losses by Persons Belonging to Managing Bodies of a Legal Person”
- Court:
- Supreme Commercial Court
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Plenary Session of the Supreme Commercial Court of 30 July 2013 № 61 “On Certain Questions of the Practice of Consideration of Disputes Connected to the Veracity of the Address of a Legal Person”
- Court:
- Supreme Commercial Court
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of 4 December 2012 № 8989/12 in the case The company Almaz-Antey vs The Kirov Regional Directorate of the Federal Service for State Registration, Cadastre and Cartography
- Court:
- Supreme Commercial Court
- Point of law: whether a transaction on the transfer of assets from a subsidiary to its mother company without any consideration is admissible?
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of 23 October 2012 № 7508/12 in the case Citizen Ivanov et al. vs The company “Sibtechgaz”
- Court:
- Supreme Commercial Court
- Point of law: the possibility to provide in company’s internal regulations for additional requirements to candidate directors (members of the board).
Subject areas:
Information Letter of the Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of 24 May 2012 № 151 “The Review of the Practice of Consideration by Commercial Courts of the Disputes Connected with the Exclusion of a Member from a Limited Liability Company”
- Court:
- Supreme Commercial Court
- In the opinion of the Presidium, a member may be excluded from a limited liability company only if he commits actions which knowingly inflict harm upon the company, thereby destroying trust among members and obstructing the continuation of normal activities of the company.
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of 24 April 2012 № 16404/11 in the case The company “Olimpia” vs The company “Parex banka” et al.
- Court:
- Supreme Commercial Court
- Points of law: 1) whether the actual presence in the territory of the Russian Federation of a representative office of a foreign legal entity constitutes, under the Agreement between the Republic of Latvia and the Russian Federation on Legal Assistance and Legal Relations in Civil, Family and Criminal Matters (1993), a sufficient ground for assuming jurisdiction by a Russian commercial court with regard to a dispute involving the aforementioned foreign legal entity, or it is only the formal presence of a properly registered representative office that may constitute the necessary precondition for such assuming of jurisdiction?; or 2) whether it is essential, for the purposes of determining the jurisdiction (proper venue), that the Russian branches of the foreign legal entity did not take part in assisting the disputed transactions?
Subject areas:
Decision of the Supreme Commercial Court of 21 February 2012 № 14589/11
- Court:
- Supreme Commercial Court
- Point of law: whether the Order of the Ministry of Culture of 25 August 2010 is lawful to the extent in which it places upon the commercial entities the duty to store a large number of various documents (enumerated in the Order) and prescribes periods for their storage?
Subject areas:
Have you spotted a typo?
Highlight it, click Ctrl+Enter and send us a message. Thank you for your help!
To be used only for spelling or punctuation mistakes.