Ruling of the Supreme Court Judicial Division for Economic Disputes of 20 February 2017 № 306-ЭС16-16518
- Court:
- Supreme Court
- Whether the procurator (public prosecutor), when applying to a court in the interest of an uncertain class of persons, should use the mandatory extrajudicial dispute settlement procedure before?
Subject areas:
Review of court practice of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation № 1 for the year 2017 (affirmed by the Presidium of the Supreme Court on 16 February 2017)
- Court:
- Supreme Court
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 17 December 2015 № 33-П upon the petition of the citizens A.V.Balyan, M.S.Dzuba et al.
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- Whether the search of an attorney’s premises is allowed within a criminal case, in which his client is considered a suspect or an accused, and if so, under what conditions?
- Dissenting opinion:
- Aranovskiy Konstantin
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 2015 № 27-П upon the petition of citizens Karabanov and Martynov
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- The constitutionality of consideration of an appellate application regarding the litigation expenses in the absence of the parties to the dispute and without notifying them.
- Dissenting opinion:
- Zhilin Gennadiy
Subject areas:
Ruling of the Constitutional Court of 6 October 2015 № 2443-O upon the petition of citizens Dinze and Sentsov
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- The constitutionality of the rule prohibiting advocates to divulge the data collected within the preliminary inquest if the investigating agency does not give its consent
- Dissenting opinion:
- Aranovskiy Konstantin
Subject areas:
Ruling of the Constitutional Court of 16 July 2015 № 1787-О on the refusal to admit for consideration the petition of the local organisation of Jehovah's Witnesses of Birobidzhan
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- Whether the contested rules admit the possibility of several contradicting court decisions on the recognition of certain texts as being extremist, and whether there was be a duty to bring the respective religious organisation to participation in the case?
- Dissenting opinion:
- Gadzhiev Gadis
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 16 July 2015 № 23-П upon the petition of citizen Makhin
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- The constitutionality of the provision, according to which during the time when the case is returned to a prosecutor for completion, the defendant is being kept in custody for the period of his/her repeated review of the case materials, so that an improvement in quality of investigation is achieved at the expense of removing the absolute deadline for keeping the defendant under custody
- Dissenting opinion:
- Gadzhiev Gadis , Danilov Yuri , Kazantsev Sergey
Subject areas:
Review of court practice of the Supreme Court for 2015 № 1 (affirmed by the Presidium of the Supreme Court on 4 March 2015)
- Court:
- Supreme Court
Subject areas:
Review of court practice of the Supreme Court for 2014 № 1 (affirmed by the Presidium of the Supreme Court on 24 December 2014)
- Court:
- Supreme Court
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 10 December 2014 № 31-П upon the petition of closed joint-stock company “Gloria”
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- Whether the legal provisions, stipulating for the possibility of seizure and sequestration of cash which was “frozen” in the course of criminal investigation with its owner and not admitting the same with regard to money in cashless form which were stolen from the current account of the victim of a crime and which are on accounts in other banks?
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 18 November 2014 № 30-П upon the petition of Sberbank of Russia
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- Whether the party, in whose favour an arbitration court issued an award, may be among the founders of an autonomous non-commercial organisation, to which that arbitration court is attached
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 11 November 2014 № 28-П upon the petition of citizens Kurochkin, Mikhailov and Rusinov
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- The constitutionality of denial to consider an application for the compensation for the violation of “the right to trial within a reasonable time” submitted by a person who was not deemed to be a victim for the purposes of criminal prosecution (also for the reason of its launching being denied), and a person who was deemed to be a victim, if from the moment of their application regarding the crime a considerable term has elapsed, which is commensurate with prescription terms for criminal prosecution, the extinction of which was a ground to refuse launching of a criminal proceedings or termination of criminal proceedings
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 21 October 2014 № 25-П upon the petition of “Avrora Compact Housing Construction” and citizens Shevchenko and Eidlen
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- The constitutionality of the provisional freezing of person’s property within the framework of pre-trial investigation, given that such person is not a suspect or accused or a person bearing civil liability in the context of the respective criminal case, but there are sufficient reasons to believe that the property in question has been received by him as a result of criminal actions of a suspect or an accused
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 18 September 2014 № 23-П upon the petition of A.A.Plankin
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- The constitutionality of denial of the right of disabled persons from the ranks of the police, whose disability was caused by fighting Chernobyl disaster, to monetary compensation in the amount equal to the non-received sums of compensation for the damage to health
Subject areas:
Have you spotted a typo?
Highlight it, click Ctrl+Enter and send us a message. Thank you for your help!
To be used only for spelling or punctuation mistakes.