• A
  • A
  • A
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Regular version of the site
Search

Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 21 October 2014 № 25-П upon the petition of “Avrora Compact Housing Construction” and citizens Shevchenko and Eidlen

The constitutionality of the provisional freezing of person’s property within the framework of pre-trial investigation, given that such person is not a suspect or accused or a person bearing civil liability in the context of the respective criminal case, but there are sufficient reasons to believe that the property in question has been received by him as a result of criminal actions of a suspect or an accused

Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 6 December 2013 № 27-П on the review of constitutionality of the rules of Article 11 and paragraphs 3 and 4 of the fourth part of article 392 of the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation in connection with the request from the presidium of Leningrad Circuit military court 

How should proceed a court which has the task of reviewing a civil case on the grounds of emergence of new circumstances if two incompatible new circumstances are present simultaneously, namely, contradictory legal opinions of the Constitutional Court of Russia and European Court of Human Rights as to whether applicable rules of Russian law are conformant to the Constitution of Russia, on the one hand, and the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, on the other?

Judgment of the Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of 26 November 2013 № 8628/13 in the case The company “Yug and K” vs The Ministry of Finance of Karachay-Cherkessia Republic

Whether the statutory mechanism of compensation for harm caused as a result of the authorities’ persistent failure to execute court decisions excludes the right to recover, additionally, the interest for the use of another’s monetary means?

Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 20 July 2012 № 20-П on the review of constitutionality of the provisions of part 1 of Article 125 and part 1 of Article 152 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation in connection with the complaint of the citizen R.G.Mishina

Legal issue: whether it is true that the contested provisions permit to arbitrarily establish the territorial jurisdiction of cases concerning the complaints against the decisions and actions (or failure to act) of the officials of investigative agencies and by so doing contradict the Constitution?

 

Have you spotted a typo?
Highlight it, click Ctrl+Enter and send us a message. Thank you for your help!
To be used only for spelling or punctuation mistakes.