• A
  • A
  • A
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Regular version of the site
Search

Ruling of the Constitutional Court of 26 January 2017 № 203-О on the refusal to admit for consideration the petition of the All-Russian Social Organisation of Disabled Persons – Russian Association of Blind Students and Professionals

Whether the Association may challenge in the Constitutional Court the decision of the Central Electoral Commission prohibiting the signing of subscription lists by means of digital signature or facsimile

Ruling of the Constitutional Court of 8 December 2015 № 2740-O upon the petition of O.V. Kukharev

Constitutionality of regulations making the acquiring of the Russian citizenship by birth dependent upon the procedure – either recognition or registration - which the parents of the person in question have chosen in order to claim their Russian citizenship
Dissenting opinion: 
Aranovskiy Konstantin

Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 31 March 2015 № 6-П upon the petition of JSC “Gazpromneft”

Is it admissible that interpretations of the Federal Tax Service not allowed to be disputed in court, since they are not technically considered regulatory legal acts?
Dissenting opinion: 
Zhilin Gennadiy , Danilov Yuri

Decision of the Supreme Commercial Court of 17 June 2014 № ВАС-7907/2013 upon the petition of the company “Argus-Spektr” 

The legality of the Federal Antimonopoly Service guidelines, on which basis the unannounced antitrust inspections (or “dawn raids”) are conducted

Judgment of the Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of 22 January 2013 № 11696/12 in the case The company “Rusal  Krasnoyarsk Aluminium Plant” vs The Government of the Russian Federation

Whether Government of the Russian Federation should be regarded as a “federal body of executive power” and, consequently, whether its actions, including the issuance of normative acts, may be subject to judicial review for the purposes of the Law on the Protection of Competition?

Judgment of the Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of 15 November 2011 № 5641/11 in the case The company “Zhabinkovskii Sugar Plant” vs The Federal Treasury et al.

Point of law: who must prove the illegality of non-feasance of a State agency – this agency or the applicant who contests such non-feasance in a court?

 

Have you spotted a typo?
Highlight it, click Ctrl+Enter and send us a message. Thank you for your help!
To be used only for spelling or punctuation mistakes.