• A
  • A
  • A
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Regular version of the site
Search

Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 31 March 2015 № 6-П upon the petition of JSC “Gazpromneft”

Is it admissible that interpretations of the Federal Tax Service not allowed to be disputed in court, since they are not technically considered regulatory legal acts?
Dissenting opinion: 
Zhilin Gennadiy , Danilov Yuri

Judgment of the Presidium of Supreme Commercial Court of 10 July 2012 № 17713/11 in the case The company “The Silver of Maghadan” vs The Interdistrict Tax Inspection № 1 for Maghadan Region

Point of law: is it lawful to have in an export contract, under which silver is sold abroad, a clause establishing a “price corridor” in the form of admissible deviations from the price of the silver in the world market?

Judgment of the Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of 18 October 2011 № 5355/11 in the case "Gazbank" vs The Inspection of the Federal Tax Service for Oktiabrskii district of Samara

Point of law: tax inspection have requested from the taxpayer the documents relating to his contractor, with the reference to Art 93.1 of the Tax Code of Russia. What kind of documents may it request under this article?

 

Have you spotted a typo?
Highlight it, click Ctrl+Enter and send us a message. Thank you for your help!
To be used only for spelling or punctuation mistakes.