Decision of the Supreme Commercial Court of 17 June 2014 № ВАС-7907/2013 upon the petition of the company “Argus-Spektr”
- Court:
- Supreme Commercial Court
- The legality of the Federal Antimonopoly Service guidelines, on which basis the unannounced antitrust inspections (or “dawn raids”) are conducted
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of 2 April 2013 № 11980/12 in the case Ru-Center vs Federal Antitrust Service
- Court:
- Supreme Commercial Court
- Whether registration of popular domain names in RU zone, selected on the basis of submitted applications, by the accredited registrar for himself, and the subsequent sale thereof in a closed auction may be regarded as a fair competition on the part of the registrar?
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of 22 January 2013 № 11696/12 in the case The company “Rusal Krasnoyarsk Aluminium Plant” vs The Government of the Russian Federation
- Court:
- Supreme Commercial Court
- Whether Government of the Russian Federation should be regarded as a “federal body of executive power” and, consequently, whether its actions, including the issuance of normative acts, may be subject to judicial review for the purposes of the Law on the Protection of Competition?
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 17 January 2013 № 1-П on the review of constitutionality of provisions of part 5 of Article 19.8 of the Code of Administrative Offences in connection with the complaint of the LLC “Maslianky Khebopriemtyi Punkt”
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- Legal issue: the constitutionality of the norm establishing for legal entities a minimal fine of 300,000 RUR for the failure to submit information upon the request of antitrust authorities.
- Dissenting opinion:
- Kokotov Aleksandr
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of 27 November 2012 № 8039/12 in the case The company “Joint Enterprise “Pamiat” vs The Volgograd Regional Branch of the Federal Antitrust Service
- Court:
- Supreme Commercial Court
- Point of law: the meaning of the requirement that a request of the antitrust body to submit documents should be “reasoned”.
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Presidium of Supreme Commercial Court of 30 July 2012 in the case The company “Russian Railways” (RZhD) vs The Directorate of the Federal Antitrust Service for Rostov Region
- Court:
- Supreme Commercial Court
- Point of law: whether it is a violation of antitrust legislation that the booking clerks of RZhD, alongside with selling railway tickets, were also rendering services on voluntary insurance, without receiving purchaser’s consent to such services and without explaining to him the conditions of insurance contract and the rules of its conclusion?
Subject areas:
Decision of the Supreme Commercial Court of 11 April 2012 № ВАС-308/12
- Court:
- Supreme Commercial Court
- Point of law: whether the amount of the State duty to be paid for the adoption of a decision concerning an objection against the issuance of a patent may be different for residents and non-residents?
Subject areas:
Have you spotted a typo?
Highlight it, click Ctrl+Enter and send us a message. Thank you for your help!
To be used only for spelling or punctuation mistakes.