Ruling of the Constitutional Court of 16 July 2015 № 1787-О on the refusal to admit for consideration the petition of the local organisation of Jehovah's Witnesses of Birobidzhan
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- Whether the contested rules admit the possibility of several contradicting court decisions on the recognition of certain texts as being extremist, and whether there was be a duty to bring the respective religious organisation to participation in the case?
- Dissenting opinion:
- Gadzhiev Gadis
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 18 September 2014 № 23-П upon the petition of A.A.Plankin
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- The constitutionality of denial of the right of disabled persons from the ranks of the police, whose disability was caused by fighting Chernobyl disaster, to monetary compensation in the amount equal to the non-received sums of compensation for the damage to health
Subject areas:
Ruling of the Constitutional Court of 17 June 2014 № 1567-O upon the request of a group of deputies of the State Duma regarding the review of constitutionality of a number of provisions of the Law of the Russian Federation on the Amendment to the Constitution of the Russian Federation “On the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation and the Procuracy of the Russian Federation”
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- The constitutionality of the Law on the amendment to the Constitution, by virtue of which the Supreme Commercial Court is being abolished and its powers are being transferred to the Supreme Court
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 6 December 2013 № 27-П on the review of constitutionality of the rules of Article 11 and paragraphs 3 and 4 of the fourth part of article 392 of the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation in connection with the request from the presidium of Leningrad Circuit military court
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- How should proceed a court which has the task of reviewing a civil case on the grounds of emergence of new circumstances if two incompatible new circumstances are present simultaneously, namely, contradictory legal opinions of the Constitutional Court of Russia and European Court of Human Rights as to whether applicable rules of Russian law are conformant to the Constitution of Russia, on the one hand, and the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, on the other?
Subject areas:
Ruling of the Constitutional Court of 22 March 2012 № 447-О-О on the refusal to accept for consideration the complaint of the citizen M.V.Lykosov against the violation of his constitutional rights by Articles 96 and 97 of the Federal constitutional law "On the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation"
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- Legal issue: whether the contested rules (as recently amended) are in conformity with part 4 of Article 125 of the Constitution, as long as they allow a citizen to bring a complaint to the Constitutional Court only against the violation of his constitutional rights and freedoms by a law which had been already applied to his case and on the condition that the consideration of this case by the court was finished?
- Dissenting opinion:
- Gadzhiev Gadis
Subject areas:
Have you spotted a typo?
Highlight it, click Ctrl+Enter and send us a message. Thank you for your help!
To be used only for spelling or punctuation mistakes.