Review of court practice of the Supreme Court for 2015 № 1 (affirmed by the Presidium of the Supreme Court on 4 March 2015)
- Court:
- Supreme Court
Subject areas:
Review of court practice of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation for the first quarter of the year 2013 (affirmed by the Presidium of the Supreme Court on 3 July 2013)
- Court:
- Supreme Court
Subject areas:
Review of court practice on civil cases related to the settlement of disputes on the performance of credit obligations (as affirmed by the Presidium of the Supreme Court on 22 May 2013)
- Court:
- Supreme Court
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of 13 November 2012 № 9007/12 in the case The company SABMiller RUS vs The company “Aleksandrit” et al.
- Court:
- Supreme Commercial Court
- Point of law: whether a dispute arising out of a lease contract which was secured by suretyship of a natural person, not having the status of individual entrepreneur, may fall nonetheless within the jurisdiction of commercial courts?
Subject areas:
Decree of the Plenary Session of the Supreme Commercial Court of 12 July 2012 N 42 “On Certain Questions Regarding the Resolution of Disputes Connected to Suretyship”
- Court:
- Supreme Commercial Court
- In this explanatory Judgment the Court has elucidated an array of issues concerning suretyships.
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of 29 March 2012 № 16882/2011 in the case The company “Commercial bank “Moskovskii kapital” et al. vs The State unitary enterprise “The Second printery of Federal Directorate of Medico-bilogical and extremal problems”
- Court:
- Supreme Commercial Court
- Point of law: under which circumstances execution may be levied against the property of the surety, if such surety is a federal unitary enterprise?
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of 13 December 2011 № 10473/11 in the case Neftekamsk branch of Sberbank vs The company "Artur-T"
- Court:
- Supreme Commercial Court
- Point of law: whether drafting of a single document signed by the parties is the only confirmation of the fact that the written form of credit contract has been observed?
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of 18 October 2011 № 6977/11 in the case Sberbank vs The Company "Ladoga"
- Court:
- Supreme Commercial Court
- Point of law: whether the contract of surety is still in force if the amount of the underlying principal obligation which it intends to secure has been increased without the consent of the guarantor?
Subject areas:
Have you spotted a typo?
Highlight it, click Ctrl+Enter and send us a message. Thank you for your help!
To be used only for spelling or punctuation mistakes.