Two decisions frоm among the ones set out in the Review appear to be the most remarkable:
- the first one says that when the decision on the recovery of a debt from the surety was made by court prior to the termination of bankruptcy proceedings with respect of the debtor and his liquidation, such decision should be nonetheless executed;
- from the second one it follows that the decision of a foreign court on dissolution of marriage between Russian citizens, when such decision endorsed the agreement of the parties on the payment of alimony and the amount thereof, may not serve as a ground for turning down an analogous suit on the award of alimony in the Russian court even if the foreign court decision did not undergo the procedure of recognition in Russia; thus, a double recovery of alimony (under both Russian and foreign court decisions) becomes possible.
