Information letter of the Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of 25 February 2014 № 165 “A Survey of Judicial Practice on Disputes Connected with Deeming Contracts to be Not Concluded”
- Court:
- Supreme Commercial Court
Subject areas:
Information Letter of the Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court from 9 July 2013 № 158 “A Survey of Court Practice on Certain Issues Connected with the Consideration by Commercial Courts of Cases with Participation of Foreign Persons”
- Court:
- Supreme Commercial Court
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of 21 June 2012 № 1831/12 in the case “Russian Phone Company” vs The company “Sony Ericsson Mobile Communicational Rus”
- Court:
- Supreme Commercial Court
- Point of law: whether a choice-of-court clause in an agreement may confer the right to apply to a competent State court upon only one party and deprive the other party of the same right, thus leaving to it only the opportunity to apply to an arbitration court?
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of 18 October 2011 № 6478/11 in the case “Afro-Asia Consulting Inc.” vs Friedel Gerhard Wilms (Germany)
- Court:
- Supreme Commercial Court
- Points of law: 1) whether an arbitration clause contained in a contract may be still valid after the expiry of the term of such contract, provided that the parties to it have made it clear by their behavior that they regard the contract as being in force in spite of the expiry of its term; 2) whether it is open for an arbitration court to determine the applicable law, or the court must in all cases apply the law which is referred to in the arbitration clause.
Subject areas:
Have you spotted a typo?
Highlight it, click Ctrl+Enter and send us a message. Thank you for your help!
To be used only for spelling or punctuation mistakes.