Survey of Court Practice in Cases Related to Unathorised Building (affirmed by the Presidium of the Supreme Court on 19 March 2013)
- Court:
- Supreme Court
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of 18 June 2013 № 17630/12 in the case The company “Veststroy” et al. vs The company “Sadovo-Spasskoe” et al.
- Court:
- Supreme Commercial Court
- From which moment the period of limitation should run in case of an unauthorised construction, given that the object of construction has yet been registered in the State Register?
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of 22 May 2012 № 17395/11 in the case The Ulianovsk regional union of consumer societies vs The Ulianovsk regional branch of the Federal Service for State Registration, Cadastre and Cartography
- Court:
- Supreme Commercial Court
- Point of law: whether the Federal law “On Participation in Shared Construction of Apartment Houses and Other Objects of Real Estate” covers the cases in which not a construction of an apartment house, but a reconstruction of an existent building takes place?
Subject areas:
Have you spotted a typo?
Highlight it, click Ctrl+Enter and send us a message. Thank you for your help!
To be used only for spelling or punctuation mistakes.