• A
  • A
  • A
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Regular version of the site
Search

Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 6 December 2013 № 27-П on the review of constitutionality of the rules of Article 11 and paragraphs 3 and 4 of the fourth part of article 392 of the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation in connection with the request from the presidium of Leningrad Circuit military court 

How should proceed a court which has the task of reviewing a civil case on the grounds of emergence of new circumstances if two incompatible new circumstances are present simultaneously, namely, contradictory legal opinions of the Constitutional Court of Russia and European Court of Human Rights as to whether applicable rules of Russian law are conformant to the Constitution of Russia, on the one hand, and the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, on the other?

Judgment of the Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of 26 November 2013 № 8628/13 in the case The company “Yug and K” vs The Ministry of Finance of Karachay-Cherkessia Republic

Whether the statutory mechanism of compensation for harm caused as a result of the authorities’ persistent failure to execute court decisions excludes the right to recover, additionally, the interest for the use of another’s monetary means?

Ruling of the Constitutional Court of 7 November 2013 № 1713-О on the refusal to accept for consideration the petition of the citizen Aliev against  violation of his constitutional rights by paragraph 2  of Article 21 of the Federal law “On the Bodies of Judicial Community in the Russian Federation” 

The constitutionality of the rule which does not provide for the right of a judge, whose disciplinary case is being considered by the qualification panel, to challenge the chairman or a member of the panel because of doubting their impartiality
Dissenting opinion: 
Kleandrov Mikhail

Judgment of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of 10 October 2013 № 20-П on the review of constitutionality of  paragraph 32«а» of  Article 4 of the Federal law “On Basic Guarantees of Electoral Rights and Rights To Participate in a Referenda of the Citizens of the Russian Federation”, part 1 of Article 10 and part 6 of Article 86 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation in connection with complaints of citizens Egorov, Kazakov, Kravtsov, Kupriyanov, Latypov and Sin’kov

The constitutionality of rules which envisage for citizens who were sentenced to deprivation of liberty for the committal of grave and particularly grave crimes (including the crimes committed before the contested rules were enacted) the life-long and unconditional deprivation of the right to be elected, regardless of the cancellation or expunging of their  record of conviction, and also regardless of whether such person has received a probationary sentence.

 

Have you spotted a typo?
Highlight it, click Ctrl+Enter and send us a message. Thank you for your help!
To be used only for spelling or punctuation mistakes.