Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 23 June 2015 № 1518-O upon the petition of A.V.Lukyanitsa
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- Does a father of two or more children have a right to receive a government support provided to families with children, regardless of the respective right of a mother of said children?
- Dissenting opinion:
- Gadzhiev Gadis
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 17 July 2014 № 22-П on the review of constitutionality of part 11 of Article 3 of the Federal law “On Monetary Provision of the Military Personnel and on Granting Certain Payments to Them”
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- The constitutionality of a rule according to which the step-mother of a military man is not entitled to an allowance and compensation on occasion of his tragic death in the army, even though she brought him up
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 1 July 2014 № 20-П of Passage 1 of Paragraph 2 of the Decree of the Supreme Council of the Russian Federation “On Extension of Effect of the Law of the RSFSR “On Social Security of Citizens Having Been Exposed to Influence of Radiation in Consequence of Chernobyl’ Atomic Power Plant Disaster” to Citizens from High-Risk Units” upon the petition of citizen Lyakin
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- The constitutionality of the regulation, which deprived the members of high-risk units who may in the future become disabled as a result of radiation, of the right to receive a compensation of harm
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 19 May 2014 № 15-П on the review of constitutionality of part 15 of Article 3 Federal law “On the Monetary Provision of the Military Personnel and Making Certain Payments to Them” upon the petition of citizen Ledovskikh
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- The constitutionality of the rule which deprives members of military personnel of monthly monetary compensation for the injury sustained as a result of military service, if they receive on the same ground other payments, such as an increased pension for long service.
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 1 April 2014 № 9-П on the review of constitutionality of a note to the List of works related to the liquidation of the consequences of the catastrophe on Chernobyl’ Atomic Power Plant and performed within the period from 26 April 1986 to 31 December 1990 in the exclusion area of the Russian Federation, upon the petitions of citizens Kuzichev and Plotnikov
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- Constitutionality of the rule which confers the status of a participant of the liquidation of Chernobyl catastrophe and the appropriate benefits only upon those citizens who were sent to perform such works upon decisions of executive bodies of State power, thus excluding those citizens who were sent to Chernobyl area by decisions of Komsomol committees and approval by the bodies of the Communist Party
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 6 February 2014 № 2-П on the review of constitutionality of subparagraph 5 of Article 4 of the Federal law “On War Veterans” in connection with the petition of citizen Korsakov
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- The constitutionality of the rule, which confers the status of a disabled veteran of the war only upon those civilians, who participated in mine clearing of the Soviet territory and have been wounded within the period which starts from February 1944.
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 24 December 2013 № 30-П on the review of constitutionality of Arts 4, 5 and paragraph 5 of Article 14 of the Federal law “On the Prevention of Spread of Tuberculosis in the Russian Federation” upon the request of the Government of Volgograd region and the Government of Sakhalin Region
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- The constitutionality of the rule which allows shifting to regional authorities the duty to provide housing to the persons having a contagious type of tuberculosis
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 2 December 2013 № 26-П on the review of constitutionality of paragraph 2 Article 4 of the Law of Chelyabinsk Region “On the Transportation Tax” upon request of the Legislative Assembly of Chelyabinsk Region
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- Legal issues: 1) whether regional legislator, proceeding from the budget opportunities of the region and with due regard to federal legislation, may establish or abolish tax benefits, in particular for pensioners? 2) whether the Constitutional Court of Russia may overcome a decision of a regional charter court, by which the contested rule has been deemed non-conformant to the charter (or constitution) of the region?
- Dissenting opinion:
- Gadzhiev Gadis
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 15 October 2013 № 21-П on the review of constitutionality of paragraph 1 of part 1 of Article 19 of the Federal law “On Social Guarantees to the Employees of Some Federal Bodies of Executive Power and Making Changes to Certain Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation” upon the request of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- Constitutionality of dismissal from service in penal enforcement system of single mothers who bring up children before 14 years of age in cases of redundancy, - given that those mothers who are in a similar position but serve in the armed forces or the police are protected against dismissal.
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 5 June 2013 № 12-П on the review of constitutionality of passage 2 of para 14 of Article 15 of the Federal law “On the Status of the Military Personnel” in connection with the complaints of citizens Zorin, Kozhushnyi and others
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- The constitutionality of rules which confer the right to monthly monetary compensation for renting an apartment only upon those military serviceman who were registered as people in need of housing by the bodies of local self-government, and not by military administration.
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 30 January 2013 № 3-П on the review of constitutionality of paragraph 7 of Article 17 of the Law of the Russian Federation “On the Social Protection of the Citizens Affected by the Radiation As a Result of the Catastrophe of Chernobyl APP” (in the version of the Federal law of 22 August 2004 № 122-ФЗ) in connection with the complaint of the citizen E.N.Stepantsov and request from Chelyabinsk regional court
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- Legal issue: whether a differentiation as to the ways of providing new housing to citizens who voluntarily left Chernobyl zone and were registered before or after 1 January 2005 as being in need of improvement of their housing was constitutional?
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 19 November 2012 № 27-П on the review of constitutionality of Item 7 of Article 20 of the Law of the Russian Federation “On the Status of Judges in the Russian Federation” and a number of provisions of the Federal Law “On Labour Pensions in the Russian Federation” in connection with the complaint of I.Yu.Frolova
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- Legal issue: whether contested provisions offer an adequate social protection to disabled family members of those judges who died because of the reasons, not relating to the performance of their professional duties?
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 24 October 2012 № 23-П on the review of constitutionality of paras 1, 2 and 4 of part 2 of Article 19 of the Law of the Russian Federation “On the Social Protection of the Citizen Who Have Suffered from Radiation as a Result of the Catastrophe on the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Station” in connection with the complaint of the citizen T.S.Chaplyghina
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- Legal issue: whether the contested rules are constitutional if they – in the meaning given to them by the continuous law-application practice – make the rendering of measures of social protection to citizens, who work in the territory of the zone of residence with privileged social and economic status, dependent upon their living (or working) there as of 2 December 1995?
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 23 April 2012 № 10-П on the review of constitutionality of the tenth passage of Article 2 of the Law of the Russian Federation "On the Employment of the Population in the Russian Federation" in connection with the complaint of the citizen E.N.Erlich
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- Legal issue: whether the contested rules are constitutional, as far as they do not allow the recognition of a founder of an association of house-owners as an unemployed person, whereas the founders (or members) of other non-commercial organisations may under the same law be recognised as being unemployed, which gives then the right to unemployment benefits.
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of the Constitutional Court 27 March 2012 № 7-П on the review of constitutionality of provisions of part 2 of Art 29 of the Law of the Russian Federation “On Militia” and paragraph 1 of part 3 of Article 43 of the Federal law "On Police" in connection with the request of Zhelezhodorozhyi district court of Penza City
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- Legal issue: whether the contested provisions are constitutional as long as they establish a lower, as compared with general rules of the civil law, amount of compensation of harm caused to the family members and dependents of a member of staff of militia (or police) by the death of bread-winner resulting from a severe injury or another damage to health connected to his discharge of official duties.
Subject areas:
Have you spotted a typo?
Highlight it, click Ctrl+Enter and send us a message. Thank you for your help!
To be used only for spelling or punctuation mistakes.