• A
  • A
  • A
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Regular version of the site
Search

Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 1 April 2014 № 9-П on the review of constitutionality of a note to the List of works related to the liquidation of the consequences of the catastrophe on Chernobyl’ Atomic Power Plant and performed within the period from 26 April 1986 to 31 December 1990 in the exclusion area of the Russian Federation, upon the petitions of citizens Kuzichev and Plotnikov 

Constitutionality of the rule which confers the status of a participant of the liquidation of Chernobyl catastrophe and the appropriate benefits only upon those citizens who were sent to perform such works upon decisions of executive bodies of State power, thus excluding those citizens who were sent to Chernobyl area by decisions of Komsomol committees and approval by the bodies of the Communist Party

Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 5 June 2012 № 13-П on the review of constitutionality of provisions of paragraph 2 of Article 1086 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation in connection with the complaint of the citizen Iu.G.Timashev

Legal issue: whether the contested provision of the Civil Code is constitutional, given that it is considered in law-application practice as enabling the plaintiff to confirm the amount of his lost earnings solely by the data contained in tax declarations, as a result of which for the individual entrepreneurs using the system of taxation in the form of unified tax on imputed income, the amount of earnings calculated thus turns to be less than their actual income, which precludes them from being compensated in full.

Judgment of the Constitutional Court of the Constitutional Court 27 March 2012 № 7-П on the review of constitutionality of provisions of part 2 of Art 29 of the Law of the Russian Federation “On Militia” and paragraph 1 of part 3 of Article 43 of the Federal law "On Police" in connection with the request of Zhelezhodorozhyi district court of Penza City

Legal issue: whether the contested provisions are constitutional as long as they establish a lower, as compared with general rules of the civil law, amount of compensation of harm caused to the family members and dependents of a member of staff of militia (or police) by the death of bread-winner resulting from a severe injury or another damage to health connected to his discharge of official duties.

 

Have you spotted a typo?
Highlight it, click Ctrl+Enter and send us a message. Thank you for your help!
To be used only for spelling or punctuation mistakes.