Judgment of the Plenary Session of the Supreme Commercial Court of 30 July 2013 № 61 “On Certain Questions of the Practice of Consideration of Disputes Connected to the Veracity of the Address of a Legal Person”
- Court:
- Supreme Commercial Court
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Plenary Session of the Supreme Commercial Court of 30 July 2013 № 62 “On Certain Issues of Compensation of Losses by Persons Belonging to Managing Bodies of a Legal Person”
- Court:
- Supreme Commercial Court
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Plenary Session of the Supreme Commercial Court of 30 July 2013 № 57 “Оn Certain Issues Arising at the Application by Courts of Part One of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation"
- Court:
- Supreme Commercial Court
Subject areas:
Information Letter of the Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court from 9 July 2013 № 158 “A Survey of Court Practice on Certain Issues Connected with the Consideration by Commercial Courts of Cases with Participation of Foreign Persons”
- Court:
- Supreme Commercial Court
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Plenary Session of the Supreme Commercial Court of 30 July 2013 № 56 “On Making an Addition to the Judgment of the Plenary Session of the Supreme Commercial Court of the Russian Federation of 23.12.2010 № 63 “On Certain Issues Connected with the Application of Chapter III.1 of the Federal law “On Insolvency (Bankruptcy)”
- Court:
- Supreme Commercial Court
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Plenary Session of the Supreme Commercial Court of 2 July 2013 № 50 “On Making Changes to the Judgment of the Plenary Session of the Supreme Commercial Court of the Russian Federation of 8 October 2012 № 60 “On Certain Questions Arising in Connection with the Creation of Court for Intellectual Property Rights within the System of Commercial Courts”
- Court:
- Supreme Commercial Court
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of 18 June 2013 № 17630/12 in the case The company “Veststroy” et al. vs The company “Sadovo-Spasskoe” et al.
- Court:
- Supreme Commercial Court
- From which moment the period of limitation should run in case of an unauthorised construction, given that the object of construction has yet been registered in the State Register?
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of 28 May 2013 № 17085/12 in the case Administration of Temriuk district vs Mikhail Radzievski, an entrepreneur
- Court:
- Supreme Commercial Court
- Points of law: 1) whether buildings and structures erected by the owner of land plot, but not registered by him in the State Register of Rights to Immovables (hereinafter: the Register), may be considered as his property? 2) whether a football pitch situated on a land plot is a separate object of real estate, the right to which may be registered? 3) may a court give its own qualification to an object, which has been registered as a real estate? 4) under which circumstances a lease-holder of a land plot may acquire the right of ownership to objects erected by him on this land plot?
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of 28 May 2013 № 17481/12 in the case Saint-Petersburg Union of Composers vs The Saint-Petersburg Directorate of the Federal Agency for Managing State Property
- Court:
- Supreme Commercial Court
- Whether non-commercial organisation may be a trustee manager under a contract of trust management of property which had been concluded before the adoption of Chapter 53 of the Civil Code which removed such opportunity for non-commercial organizations?
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of 2 April 2013 № 11980/12 in the case Ru-Center vs Federal Antitrust Service
- Court:
- Supreme Commercial Court
- Whether registration of popular domain names in RU zone, selected on the basis of submitted applications, by the accredited registrar for himself, and the subsequent sale thereof in a closed auction may be regarded as a fair competition on the part of the registrar?
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of 26 March 2013 № 14828/12 in the case Condominium "Skakovaya 5" vs The company "Arteks Corporation"
- Court:
- Supreme Commercial Court
- Points of law: 1) whether findings having pre-judicial significance should be set out in reasoned part of court decision or only in the resolutive one? 2) how the burden of proof should be apportioned by a court if there are reasons to believe that a party to the dispute, an offshore company, abuses the law – namely, it hides its affiliation with a party to an earlier dispute having pre-judicial significance, with the purpose of overcoming pre-judicial effect of the previous decision by appearing as a new party in the later dispute on the same issues.
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of 12 March 2013 № 8711/12 in the case Мunicipal unitary enterprise “Raizhilkombytgazstroy” vs The Administration of Alekseevsk district of Volgograd Region
- Court:
- Supreme Commercial Court
- Whether the recovery of compensation for the failure to execute court decision within a reasonable term is an efficient compulsory measure?
Subject areas:
The Information Letter of the Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of 26 February 2013 № 156 “A Survey of the Practice of Consideration by Commercial Courts of Public Policy Clause as a Ground for Refusal to Recognise and Enforce Foreign Court Decisions and Arbitral Awards”
- Court:
- Supreme Commercial Court
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Plenary Session of the Supreme Commercial Court of 25 January 2013 № 13 “On making additions to the Judgment of the Supreme Commercial Court of the Russian Federation of 17 November 2011 № 73 “On certain questions of the practice of applying the rules of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation to lease contracts”
- Court:
- Supreme Commercial Court
Subject areas:
Have you spotted a typo?
Highlight it, click Ctrl+Enter and send us a message. Thank you for your help!
To be used only for spelling or punctuation mistakes.