• A
  • A
  • A
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Regular version of the site
Search

Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 19 March 2014 № 6-П in the case of verification of constitutionality of an international treaty, which has not yet entered into force, between the Russian Federation and the Republic of Crimea on the admission of the Republic of Crimea into the Russian Federation and on the creation within the Russian Federation of new subjects

The constitutionality of the international treaty, which has been signed on 18 March 2014 but has not yet entered into force, between the Russian Federation and the Republic of Crimea on the admission of the Republic of Crimea into the Russian Federation and on the creation within the Russian Federation of new subjects – the Republic of Crimea and the federal city Sevastopol

Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 18 March 2014 № 5-П on the review of constitutionality of part 2.1 of Art 399 of the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation in connection with the request of Ketovsk district court of Kurgan region  

Сonstitutionality of regulation guaranteeing the right of the victim of crime or his representative to take part in court hearings in which the issue of parole (conditional early release from prison) of the offender is being considered and making the notification of the victim or his representative a precondition of such consideration (even in cases when the court sees no need of receiving an additional information from the victim)

Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 21 February 2014 № 3-П on the review of constitutionality of paragraph 1 of Article 19 of the Federal law “On Limited Liability Companies” upon the petition of the limited liability company “Firma Reiting”

The constitutionality of the contested provision, as soon as it enables one or several members of the company, who disagree with the decision of the general meeting of company’s shareholders to increase its charter capital, to obstruct this decision by way of refusal from or delay in contributing their part of additional capital.

Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 6 February 2014 № 2-П on the review of constitutionality of subparagraph 5 of Article 4 of the Federal law “On War Veterans” in connection with the petition of citizen Korsakov

The constitutionality of the rule, which confers the status of a disabled veteran of the war only upon those civilians, who participated in mine clearing of the Soviet territory and have been wounded within the period which starts from February 1944.

Ruling of the Constitutional Court of 4 February 2014 № 222-О on the refusal to accept for consideration the petition of the limited liability company “Baltiyskiy Lizing” against violation of its constitutional rights  by paragraph 3 of Article 421, paragraph 1 of Article 454, paragraph 1 of article 624, paragraph 1 of Article 1102 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation and paragraph 1 of Article 19 of the Federal law “On Financial Lease (Leasing)”

The constitutionality of contested rules as implying the right of the lessee to recover from the lessor at the termination of the contract a part of previously made leasing payments as an unjust enrichment, regardless of the actual financial result of the leasing operation, and in particular regardless of the losses of the lessor, caused by the breach by the lessee of his obligations under contract and its subsequent termination

Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 23 December 2013 № 29-П on the review of constitutionality of passage one of paragraph 1 of Article 1158 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation upon the petition of citizen Kondrachuk  

Constitutionality of contested provision in the light of the fact that it does not enable making an unequivocal conclusion as to whether the refusal of inheritance for the benefit of a specific person from among other heirs (the so-called “directed refusal of inheritance”) is lawful or not

Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 6 December 2013 № 27-П on the review of constitutionality of the rules of Article 11 and paragraphs 3 and 4 of the fourth part of article 392 of the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation in connection with the request from the presidium of Leningrad Circuit military court 

How should proceed a court which has the task of reviewing a civil case on the grounds of emergence of new circumstances if two incompatible new circumstances are present simultaneously, namely, contradictory legal opinions of the Constitutional Court of Russia and European Court of Human Rights as to whether applicable rules of Russian law are conformant to the Constitution of Russia, on the one hand, and the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, on the other?

Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 2 December 2013 № 26-П on the review of constitutionality of paragraph 2 Article 4 of the Law of Chelyabinsk Region “On the Transportation Tax” upon request of the Legislative Assembly of Chelyabinsk Region 

Legal issues: 1) whether regional legislator, proceeding from the budget opportunities of the region and with due regard to federal legislation, may establish or abolish tax benefits, in particular for pensioners? 2) whether the Constitutional Court of Russia may overcome a decision of a regional charter court, by which the contested rule has been deemed non-conformant to the charter (or constitution) of the region?
Dissenting opinion: 
Gadzhiev Gadis

 

Have you spotted a typo?
Highlight it, click Ctrl+Enter and send us a message. Thank you for your help!
To be used only for spelling or punctuation mistakes.