Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 5 April 2013 № 7-П on the review of constitutionality of the forth passage of the first part of Article 6 of the Labour Code of the Russian Federation in connection with the request of Archangelsk Regional Assembly of Deputies
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- Legal issue: whether regional legislator may establish one-time payment amounting to two monetary remunerations of the deputies of the regional Assembly who exercise their powers on the professional permanent basis at the moment of termination of their powers, given that under Labour Code of Russia the establishment of additional guarantees to particular categories of employees relates to the competence of federal authorities?
Subject areas:
Ruling of the Constitutional Court of 5 March 2013 № 353-O on the refusal to accept for consideration the complaints of the citizens A.V.Kapaev and A.O.Tsvetkov against the violations of their constitutional rights by paragraph 2"а" of Article 24 of the Federal law “On the Military Duty and Military Service”
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- The constitutionality of the rule which allows drafting the persons who are receiving secondary professional education as soon as they reach 20 years of age, irrespective of whether they have already graduated or not, thus depriving them of the opportunity to complete their education without breaks and putting them in unequal position as compared to citizens receiving higher professional education.
- Dissenting opinion:
- Aranovskiy Konstantin , Gadzhiev Gadis
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 30 January 2013 № 3-П on the review of constitutionality of paragraph 7 of Article 17 of the Law of the Russian Federation “On the Social Protection of the Citizens Affected by the Radiation As a Result of the Catastrophe of Chernobyl APP” (in the version of the Federal law of 22 August 2004 № 122-ФЗ) in connection with the complaint of the citizen E.N.Stepantsov and request from Chelyabinsk regional court
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- Legal issue: whether a differentiation as to the ways of providing new housing to citizens who voluntarily left Chernobyl zone and were registered before or after 1 January 2005 as being in need of improvement of their housing was constitutional?
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 25 December 2012 № 33-П on the review of constitutionality of the provisions of Article 213.1 of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation in connection with the complaint of V.N.Kononov
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 19 November 2012 № 27-П on the review of constitutionality of Item 7 of Article 20 of the Law of the Russian Federation “On the Status of Judges in the Russian Federation” and a number of provisions of the Federal Law “On Labour Pensions in the Russian Federation” in connection with the complaint of I.Yu.Frolova
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- Legal issue: whether contested provisions offer an adequate social protection to disabled family members of those judges who died because of the reasons, not relating to the performance of their professional duties?
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 7 November 2012 № 24-П on the review of constitutionality of part 1 of Article 2 of the Federal law of 12 February 2001 № 5-ФЗ “On Making Changes in and Amendments to the Law of the Russian Federation “On the Social Protection of the Citizens Affected by the Radiation As a Result of the Catastrophe of Chernobyl APP” in the interpretation given to its provisions in the law-application practice after the entering into force of the Judgment of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of 20 December 2010 № 21-П, in connection with the complaint of the citizen R.Inamov
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- Legal issue: whether the contested provisions, as interpreted by law-application practice in the wake of the Judgment of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of 20 December 2010 № 21-П, are conformant to the Constitution, as long as they serve as a ground for refusal of calculating the amount of monetary compensation to disabled persons from the ranks of military personnel who took part in the liquidation of Chernobyl catastrophe, on the basis of their money allowance with due regard to the degree of the loss of their work capacity?
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 24 October 2012 № 23-П on the review of constitutionality of paras 1, 2 and 4 of part 2 of Article 19 of the Law of the Russian Federation “On the Social Protection of the Citizen Who Have Suffered from Radiation as a Result of the Catastrophe on the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Station” in connection with the complaint of the citizen T.S.Chaplyghina
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- Legal issue: whether the contested rules are constitutional if they – in the meaning given to them by the continuous law-application practice – make the rendering of measures of social protection to citizens, who work in the territory of the zone of residence with privileged social and economic status, dependent upon their living (or working) there as of 2 December 1995?
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 5 June 2012 № 13-П on the review of constitutionality of provisions of paragraph 2 of Article 1086 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation in connection with the complaint of the citizen Iu.G.Timashev
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- Legal issue: whether the contested provision of the Civil Code is constitutional, given that it is considered in law-application practice as enabling the plaintiff to confirm the amount of his lost earnings solely by the data contained in tax declarations, as a result of which for the individual entrepreneurs using the system of taxation in the form of unified tax on imputed income, the amount of earnings calculated thus turns to be less than their actual income, which precludes them from being compensated in full.
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 23 April 2012 № 10-П on the review of constitutionality of the tenth passage of Article 2 of the Law of the Russian Federation "On the Employment of the Population in the Russian Federation" in connection with the complaint of the citizen E.N.Erlich
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- Legal issue: whether the contested rules are constitutional, as far as they do not allow the recognition of a founder of an association of house-owners as an unemployed person, whereas the founders (or members) of other non-commercial organisations may under the same law be recognised as being unemployed, which gives then the right to unemployment benefits.
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of the Constitutional Court 27 March 2012 № 7-П on the review of constitutionality of provisions of part 2 of Art 29 of the Law of the Russian Federation “On Militia” and paragraph 1 of part 3 of Article 43 of the Federal law "On Police" in connection with the request of Zhelezhodorozhyi district court of Penza City
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- Legal issue: whether the contested provisions are constitutional as long as they establish a lower, as compared with general rules of the civil law, amount of compensation of harm caused to the family members and dependents of a member of staff of militia (or police) by the death of bread-winner resulting from a severe injury or another damage to health connected to his discharge of official duties.
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 27 February 2012 № 3-П on the review of constitutionality of passage 2 of para 14 of Article 15 of the Federal law “On the Status of the Military Personnel” in connection with the complaints of citizens A.N.Khmara and V.N.Shum
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- Legal issue: the constitutionality of the contested provision under which former members of military personnel in need of dwelling have been denied a money compensation on the ground that only those were entitled to such compensation who had been registered for this purpose before 1 January 2005.
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 9 February 2012 № 2-П on the review of constitutionality of a provision of part 8 of Article 325 of the Labour Code of the Russian Federation in connection with the complaint of the citizen I.G.Trunova
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- Legal issue: the provision in question guarantees to the members of staff of the organizations belonging to the State or local governments who work in the Far North and similar localities a compensation of expenses for their return trip to the place of statutory leave. Does such guarantee extend also to persons working for private employers, and if not, whether such distinction is constitutional?
- Dissenting opinion:
- Aranovskiy Konstantin , Kazantsev Sergey
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 7 February 2012 № 1-П on the review of constitutionality of the first part of Article 2 of the Federal law of 12 February 2001 № 5-ФЗ “On Making Changes and Additions to the Law of the Russian Federation “On the Social Protection of the Citizens Affected by the Radiation As a Result of the Catastrophe of Chernobyl APP” in connection with the complaint of the citizen V.V.Avdonin
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- Legal issue: whether the system of compensations as established by the contested provision should extend to disabled persons from the ranks of the police on the same footing as to those from the ranks of the military, and if not, whether such inequality would be constitutional?
Subject areas:
1
2
Have you spotted a typo?
Highlight it, click Ctrl+Enter and send us a message. Thank you for your help!
To be used only for spelling or punctuation mistakes.