Ruling of the Constitutional Court of 17 June 2014 № 1567-O upon the request of a group of deputies of the State Duma regarding the review of constitutionality of a number of provisions of the Law of the Russian Federation on the Amendment to the Constitution of the Russian Federation “On the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation and the Procuracy of the Russian Federation”
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- The constitutionality of the Law on the amendment to the Constitution, by virtue of which the Supreme Commercial Court is being abolished and its powers are being transferred to the Supreme Court
Subject areas:
Ruling of the Constitutional Court of 5 June 2014 № 1211-O on the refusal to admit to consideration the petition of A.V.Mizev against the violation of his constitutional rights by paragraph 3 of part 1 of Article 29 of the Federal law “On the Police” and paragraph 7 of part 3 of Article 82 of the Federal law “On the Service in the Bodies of the Ministry of the Interior of the Russian Federation and on Making Changes to Particular Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation”
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- The constitutionality of the dismissal of a policeman in cases of termination of criminal prosecution against him on the grounds of the expiry of statute of limitations, reconciliation of the parties, amnesty or active repentance.
- Dissenting opinion:
- Kokotov Aleksandr
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 20 May 2014 № 16-П on the review of constitutionality of paragraph 1 of part 3 of Article 31 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation upon the petition of citizen Filimonov
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- 1) the constitutionality of exemption of certain categories of crimes committed by minors from the jurisdiction of court with participation of jurors; 2) the constitutionality of denying a minor of the right to the jury trial, given that his motion to that effect has been submitted prior than the law, which had exempted from juror’s jurisdiction the crimes he was indicted for, came into force.
Subject areas:
Decree of the Plenary Session of the Supreme Commercial Court of 16 May 2014 № 27 “On Certain Questions of Application of Legislation on Executive Proceedings”
- Court:
- Supreme Commercial Court
Subject areas:
Decree of the Plenary Session of the Supreme Commercial Court of 4 April 2014 № 22 “On Certain Issues of Awarding Monetary Means to Recoverer in Case of Non-Execution of Court Act”
- Court:
- Supreme Commercial Court
Subject areas:
Decree of the Plenary Session of the Supreme Commercial Court of 4 April 2014 № 23 “On Certain Issues of the Practice of Application by Commercial Courts of Legislation on Expert Examination”
- Court:
- Supreme Commercial Court
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 25 March 2014 № 8-П on the review of constitutionality of a number of provisions of Articles 401.3, 401.5, 401.8 and 401.17 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation upon the petitions of citizens Agaev, Bakayan and others
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- The constitutionality of rules which enable the judge of a regional court or a court of the same level to deny the transfer of cassational complaint for consideration in the court of cassational instance
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 18 March 2014 № 5-П on the review of constitutionality of part 2.1 of Art 399 of the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation in connection with the request of Ketovsk district court of Kurgan region
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- Сonstitutionality of regulation guaranteeing the right of the victim of crime or his representative to take part in court hearings in which the issue of parole (conditional early release from prison) of the offender is being considered and making the notification of the victim or his representative a precondition of such consideration (even in cases when the court sees no need of receiving an additional information from the victim)
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of 4 February 2014 № 9189/13 in the case KAO Corporation vs The company “Markos”
- Court:
- Supreme Commercial Court
- 1) whether compensation for the unlawful use of a trademark may be regarded as a penalty? 2) whether plaintiff’s expenses for court fee must be reimbursed to him in accordance with the amount of compensation he claimed for violation of his right to the trademark or in accordance with the amount that was actually awarded by the court?
Subject areas:
Decree of the Plenary Session of the Supreme Commercial Court of 25 December 2013 № 99 “On Procedural Terms”
- Court:
- Supreme Commercial Court
Subject areas:
Decree of the Plenary Session of the Supreme Court of 19 December 2013 № 41 “On the Practice of Application by Courts of the Legislation on Preventive Measures in the Form of Placing Under Guard, Home Arrest and Bail”
- Court:
- Supreme Court
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 6 December 2013 № 27-П on the review of constitutionality of the rules of Article 11 and paragraphs 3 and 4 of the fourth part of article 392 of the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation in connection with the request from the presidium of Leningrad Circuit military court
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- How should proceed a court which has the task of reviewing a civil case on the grounds of emergence of new circumstances if two incompatible new circumstances are present simultaneously, namely, contradictory legal opinions of the Constitutional Court of Russia and European Court of Human Rights as to whether applicable rules of Russian law are conformant to the Constitution of Russia, on the one hand, and the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, on the other?
Subject areas:
Review of court practice related to amnesty (as affirmed by the Presidium of the Supreme Court on 5 December 2013)
- Court:
- Supreme Court
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 2 December 2013 № 26-П on the review of constitutionality of paragraph 2 Article 4 of the Law of Chelyabinsk Region “On the Transportation Tax” upon request of the Legislative Assembly of Chelyabinsk Region
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- Legal issues: 1) whether regional legislator, proceeding from the budget opportunities of the region and with due regard to federal legislation, may establish or abolish tax benefits, in particular for pensioners? 2) whether the Constitutional Court of Russia may overcome a decision of a regional charter court, by which the contested rule has been deemed non-conformant to the charter (or constitution) of the region?
- Dissenting opinion:
- Gadzhiev Gadis
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of 26 November 2013 № 8628/13 in the case The company “Yug and K” vs The Ministry of Finance of Karachay-Cherkessia Republic
- Court:
- Supreme Commercial Court
- Whether the statutory mechanism of compensation for harm caused as a result of the authorities’ persistent failure to execute court decisions excludes the right to recover, additionally, the interest for the use of another’s monetary means?
Subject areas:
Have you spotted a typo?
Highlight it, click Ctrl+Enter and send us a message. Thank you for your help!
To be used only for spelling or punctuation mistakes.