• A
  • A
  • A
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Regular version of the site
Search

Judgment of the Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of 17 January 2012 № 11292/11 in the case The Company "RLP-Yarmarka" vs The company "Aternum"

Judgment of the Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of 17 January 2012 № 11292/11 in the case The Company “RLP-Yarmarka” vs The company “Aternum”

Decree of the Plenary Session of the Supreme Commercial Court of 22 December 2011 № 81 “On certain questions of the application of Article 333 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation”

In this decree the Supreme Commercial Court has resolved a number of controversial issues relating to the reduction of contractual penalty by way of court decisions.

Subject areas: 

Judgment of the Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of 20 December 2011 № 9924/11 in the case The company "Instroy" vs The company "SU-155"

Point of law: whether a suit seeking to coerce the purchaser to pay the contract sum under a contract of purchase-sale of land plot falls within the jurisdiction of commercial court at the location of the land plot?

Judgment of the Presidium of Supreme Commercial Court of 20 December 2011 № 12262/11 in the case of the company "Grosh&K"

Point of law: the federal law which entered into force on 1 November 2010 has limited the right to file to a court an application regarding the recovery of litigation costs by 6 month term from the moment of the completion of consideration of the case. Does this rule have a retroactive force and whether it may apply to cases whose consideration has been finished before that date?

Judgment of the Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of 13 December 2011 № 10473/11 in the case Neftekamsk branch of Sberbank vs The company "Artur-T"

Point of law: whether drafting of a single document signed by the parties is the only confirmation of the fact that the written form of credit contract has been observed?

Judgment of the Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of 13 December 2011 № 9807/11 in the case Legal Centre in the Caucasian spa "Arbitr" vs The Enterprise "Stavropolkraivodokanal"

Point of law: whether arbitration courts do have powers to compulsorily impose upon parties to arbitration proceedings fines for non-payment of arbitration fees provided for by the rules of the arbitration court?

Judgment of the Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of 13 December 2011 № 10590/11 in the case Liudmila Belochkina vs Oksana Chernyh et al.

Point of law: under which circumstances a sales-purchase contract with regard to a share in a limited liability company (LLC) must be held invalid, given that the purchaser was a third person (not a member of the LLC) whereas the charter of the company explicitly prohibited selling a share (or a part thereof) to any third person?

Judgment of the Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of 13 December 2011 № 9350/11 in the case The company "Trast-S" vs The Federal Service of Court Bailiffs

Point of law: whether an enforcement fee wrongly levied by a court bailiff-executor from the debtor and subsequently refunded following a suit of one of the creditors should be entirely spent to meet lawful claims of this particular creditor or the latter is entitled to only pro rata portion of the sum in question in accordance with the share of his claims within the consolidated execution procedure?

Judgment of the Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of 22 November 2011 № 17912/09 in the case The Company "Priokskoe" vs Company "Akvamarin" et al.

Point of law: whether the loss of corporate control by a member of limited liability company which has led to the temporary inability to change the LLC’s director-general, may serve as a ground for the tolling of the period of limitations for the purposes of challenging a transaction concluded by this director-general?

Judgment of the Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of 22 November 2011 № 9113/11 in the case The Federal treasury enterprise “Samara factory ‘Kommunar’” vs “The interregional distribution grid company of Volga”

Point of law: whether the coercion to conclude a contract on the transmission of electricity between allied grid companies is lawful, provided that in the proposed draft of the contract the plaintiff appears only as a contractor (the one who renders services) whereas the defendant (the company which is being compelled to the conclusion of the contract) appears only as a customer (the consumer of services)?

Decree of the Plenary Session of the Supreme Commercial Court of 17 November 2011 № 73 "On certain questions of the practice of applying the rules of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation to lease contracts"

The Plenary Session has clarified a number of unclear issues in the area of lease contracts, particularly as regards the procedures of public tender for the right to lease State and municipal property.

Subject areas: 

Judgment of the Presidium of the Supreme Commercial Court of 17 November 2011 № 4238/11 in the case The company “Lecaz Holdings Limited” (Cyprus) vs The company "RN-Vlakra"

Point of law: whether the shareholder of a closed joint-stock company is considered to be properly notified about the holding of the general meeting of shareholders, given that he was represented by a management company, but the trust management contract with this company had already been terminated by the time of the meeting being held?

Judgment of the Presidium of the Supreme Court of 15 November 2011 N 8654/11 in the case Coal company “Severnyi Kuzbass” vs The Federal Inspection № 1 for Major Taxpayers of Kemerovo Region

Point of law: what is the role of international treaties with regard to interest payments from Russian companies to foreign residents – whether they regulate the composition of expenses deductible at the taxation of the profit of Russian companies, or such composition must be determined in accordance with the rules of the Russian Tax Code?

 

Have you spotted a typo?
Highlight it, click Ctrl+Enter and send us a message. Thank you for your help!
To be used only for spelling or punctuation mistakes.