Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 19 November 2013 № 24-П on the review of constitutionality of part one of Article 10 of Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, part 2 of Article 24, part 2 of Article 27, part 4 of Article 133 and Article 212 of Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation in connection with complaints of citizens Borovkov and Morozov
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- Constitutionality of rules which permit the closure of criminal case due to the adoption of a law which decriminalised the pertinent offence, but do not require the consent of the person concerned, given that such person objects against the closure of the case without judicial review of the legality and justifiability of those suspicions or charges that have been brought against him.
Subject areas:
Ruling of the Constitutional Court of 7 November 2013 № 1713-О on the refusal to accept for consideration the petition of the citizen Aliev against violation of his constitutional rights by paragraph 2 of Article 21 of the Federal law “On the Bodies of Judicial Community in the Russian Federation”
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- The constitutionality of the rule which does not provide for the right of a judge, whose disciplinary case is being considered by the qualification panel, to challenge the chairman or a member of the panel because of doubting their impartiality
- Dissenting opinion:
- Kleandrov Mikhail
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 6 November 2013 № 23-П on the review of constitutionality of part 1 of Article 56 of the Law of the Russian Federation “On the Provision of Pensions to Persons Who Were Doing Military Service, the Service in Police, the Fire Safety Service, the Federal Drug Control Service, Penitentiary Service, and of Their Families” in connection with complaint of citizen Fedin
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- Whether such pensioners have a right to remit the pensions from Sberbank (through which their pensions are paid) to their accounts in other banks without paying for this.
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 24 October 2013 № 22-П on the review of constitutionality of passages 1-8 of Article 3 of the Federal law “On Trade Unions, Their Rights and Guarantees of Activity” in connection with the complaints of All-Russian Trade Union of the Workers of Oil and Gas Industries and Construction and All-Russian Trade Union of the Workers of State Institutions and of Social Services of the Russian Federation
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- Whether All-Russian trade unions may create subdivisions that are not envisaged by Article 3 of the Law on Trade Unions – for example, interregional, united or shop trade unions.
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 15 October 2013 № 21-П on the review of constitutionality of paragraph 1 of part 1 of Article 19 of the Federal law “On Social Guarantees to the Employees of Some Federal Bodies of Executive Power and Making Changes to Certain Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation” upon the request of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- Constitutionality of dismissal from service in penal enforcement system of single mothers who bring up children before 14 years of age in cases of redundancy, - given that those mothers who are in a similar position but serve in the armed forces or the police are protected against dismissal.
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of 10 October 2013 № 20-П on the review of constitutionality of paragraph 32«а» of Article 4 of the Federal law “On Basic Guarantees of Electoral Rights and Rights To Participate in a Referenda of the Citizens of the Russian Federation”, part 1 of Article 10 and part 6 of Article 86 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation in connection with complaints of citizens Egorov, Kazakov, Kravtsov, Kupriyanov, Latypov and Sin’kov
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- The constitutionality of rules which envisage for citizens who were sentenced to deprivation of liberty for the committal of grave and particularly grave crimes (including the crimes committed before the contested rules were enacted) the life-long and unconditional deprivation of the right to be elected, regardless of the cancellation or expunging of their record of conviction, and also regardless of whether such person has received a probationary sentence.
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 18 July 2013 № 19-П on the review of constitutionality of paragraph 13 of part 1 of Article 83, third passage of part 2 of Article 331 and Article 351.1 of the Labour Code of the Russian Federation upon the complaints of citizens Barabash, Bekasov and others and request from Murmansk Regional Parliament
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- Constitutionality of legislative restrictions upon professional work with minors
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 9 July 2013 № 18-П on the review of constitutionality of provisions of paragraphs 1, 5 and 6 of Article 152 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation in connection with the complaint of citizen Krylov
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- The constitutionality of rules which deprive a citizen of the right to demand in court proceedings the removal of defamatory information from a web site and exclude the liability of the web site administrator (or owner) for its dissemination.
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 2 July 2013 № 16-П on the review of constitutionality of provisions of part one of Article 237 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation in connection with the complaint of B.Gadaev and the request of Kurgan Regional Court
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- The right of a court – either at its own initiative or upon the motion of the victim of crime - to remand a criminal case to the prosecutors for the purposes of removing obstacles to its judicial consideration in the event when facts testify to the commission by the accused of a more grave crime than he was actually indicted for by the prosecutors.
- Dissenting opinion:
- Kazantsev Sergey
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 2 July 2013 № 17-П on the review of constitutionality of the provisions of paragraph 1, Article 5, and Article 391of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation in connection with the complaint of Open Joint-Stock Company “Omskmashina”
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- The constitutionality of the procedure for entering into force of normative acts concerning the calculation of cadastre value of land plots, in the light of the fact that such acts may affect the obligations of the payers of the land tax, but at the same time they enter into force otherwise than in the special procedure for tax legislation entering into force.
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 27 June 2013 № 15-П on the review of constitutionality of provisions of parts 3 and 10 of Article 40 of the Federal law “On the General Principles of Organisation of Local Self-Government in the Russian Federation” and paragraph 3 of part one of Article 83 of the Labour Code of the Russian Federation in connection with the complaint of citizen Dubkov
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- Constitutionality of the regulation which precludes the reinstatement of a dismissed head of municipality in his office on the ground that prior to the end of judicial proceedings a new head of municipality has been elected
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 25 June 2013 № 14-П on the review of constitutionality of part 1 of Article 1, paragraph 1 of part 1, parts 6 and 7 of Article 3 of the Federal law “On Compensation for the violation of the Right to Court Examination Within a Reasonable Term or the Right to Execution of Judicial Act Within a Reasonable Term”, parts 1 and 4 of Article 2441 and paragraph 1 of part 1 of Article 2446 of the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation upon the complaint of citizen Popova
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- The constitutionality of rules which preclude the victim of crime from having recourse to court with the demand to award compensation for the violation of his right to criminal proceedings within a reasonable term, if as a result of criminal investigation instituted upon his application the suspects and the accused were not identified.
- Dissenting opinion:
- Zhilin Gennadiy
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 17 June 2013 № 13-П on the review of constitutionality of part 2 of Article 2 of the Federal law of 23 December 2010 № 360-ФЗ “On Making Changes in the Federal Law “On the Additional Social Security of the Members of the Flying Crews of Civil Aviation Aircrafts” in connection with the requests from commercial courts of Sakhalin Region and Primorskiy Krai
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- The constitutionality of the disputed rule, as long as the change introduced by it (namely, the removal of a limit on the amount of payments and remunerations on the basis of which the contributions for an addition to aviators’ pensions were calculated and exacted) was given retroactive force.
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 5 June 2013 № 12-П on the review of constitutionality of passage 2 of para 14 of Article 15 of the Federal law “On the Status of the Military Personnel” in connection with the complaints of citizens Zorin, Kozhushnyi and others
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- The constitutionality of rules which confer the right to monthly monetary compensation for renting an apartment only upon those military serviceman who were registered as people in need of housing by the bodies of local self-government, and not by military administration.
Subject areas:
Ruling of the Constitutional Court of 4 June 2013 № 900-O on the refusal to accept for consideration the complaints of the citizen Tamara Chirkova against the violation of her constitutional rights by the provisions of Article 30.1 of the Code of Administrative Offences
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- The constitutionality of provisions which deprive close relatives of the deceased of the right to challenge termination of proceedings in a case on administrative offence in which he was involved – whether such provisions violate the presumption of innocence and the right to judicial protection, and whether they accord to constitutional requirements as to the protection of honour, dignity and good name.
- Dissenting opinion:
- Rudkin Yuri , Zhilin Gennadiy
Subject areas:
Have you spotted a typo?
Highlight it, click Ctrl+Enter and send us a message. Thank you for your help!
To be used only for spelling or punctuation mistakes.