Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 1 March 2012 № 6-П on the review of constitutionality of a provision of passage 2 of subparagraph 2 of paragraph 1 of Article 220 of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation in connection with the complaint of the Attorney for Human Rights in the Russian Federation
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- Legal issue: the constitutionality of the contested provision, as interpreted by the current court practice, which refuses to grant tax deduction for the purposes of personal income tax to a parent who has incurred expenses for acquiring for his non-adult child the ownership to a dwelling (an apartment) situated in the territory of the Russian Federation.
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 28 February 2012 № 4-П on the review of constitutionality of para 11 of Art 12 of the Federal law “On General Principles of Organisation of Legislative (Representative) and Executive Bodies of State Power of the Constituent Entities of the Russian Federation” in connection with the complaint of citizen T.I.Romanova
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- Legal issue: whether the contested regulation is constitutional, given that it served as a ground for the exclusion of a deputy of legislative (representative) body of State power of a constituent entity of the Russian Federation from a party group in the regional parliament and for the pre-term termination of his powers is case of his leaving the political party on whose list of candidates he had been elected and whose group in parliament he is a member of?
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 27 February 2012 № 3-П on the review of constitutionality of passage 2 of para 14 of Article 15 of the Federal law “On the Status of the Military Personnel” in connection with the complaints of citizens A.N.Khmara and V.N.Shum
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- Legal issue: the constitutionality of the contested provision under which former members of military personnel in need of dwelling have been denied a money compensation on the ground that only those were entitled to such compensation who had been registered for this purpose before 1 January 2005.
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 9 February 2012 № 2-П on the review of constitutionality of a provision of part 8 of Article 325 of the Labour Code of the Russian Federation in connection with the complaint of the citizen I.G.Trunova
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- Legal issue: the provision in question guarantees to the members of staff of the organizations belonging to the State or local governments who work in the Far North and similar localities a compensation of expenses for their return trip to the place of statutory leave. Does such guarantee extend also to persons working for private employers, and if not, whether such distinction is constitutional?
- Dissenting opinion:
- Aranovskiy Konstantin , Kazantsev Sergey
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 7 February 2012 № 1-П on the review of constitutionality of the first part of Article 2 of the Federal law of 12 February 2001 № 5-ФЗ “On Making Changes and Additions to the Law of the Russian Federation “On the Social Protection of the Citizens Affected by the Radiation As a Result of the Catastrophe of Chernobyl APP” in connection with the complaint of the citizen V.V.Avdonin
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- Legal issue: whether the system of compensations as established by the contested provision should extend to disabled persons from the ranks of the police on the same footing as to those from the ranks of the military, and if not, whether such inequality would be constitutional?
Subject areas:
Ruling of the Constitutional Court of 17 January 2012 № 174-О-О on the refusal to accept for consideration the complaint of the citizen Iu.R.Iudin against violation of his constitutional rights by Articles 301 and 312 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- Legal issue: whether the contested provisions are constitutional, since they do not envisage the right of the convicted person and his advocate to have access to a dissenting opinion of a member of the panel of judges?
- Dissenting opinion:
- Gadzhiev Gadis , Zhilin Gennadiy , Knyazev Sergey , Kleandrov Mikhail
Subject areas:
Have you spotted a typo?
Highlight it, click Ctrl+Enter and send us a message. Thank you for your help!
To be used only for spelling or punctuation mistakes.