Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 4 June 2015 № 13-П upon the petition of V.A.Knyazik and P.N.Puzyrin
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- Is the state liable for compensation issued to the good-faith purchaser of real estate, when such transaction was later annulled by the court, with such compensation based on the fact that the relevant state body bears responsibility for wrongful actions while registering the rights to said real estate (residential property)
- Dissenting opinion:
- Bondar Nikolay
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 24 March 2015 № 5-П upon the petition of citizen A.M.Bogatyrev
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- Constitutionality of remaining of the right to use residential premises at a housing co-op with persons who had original title to it, when such residential premises were sold at a public auction as a remedy to rectify default in repayment of a mortgage
- Dissenting opinion:
- Yaroslavtsev Vladimir , Gadzhiev Gadis
Subject areas:
Review of court practice of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on the cases connected to the guaranteeing of housing rights of citizens in cases of deeming a residential house to be in wrecking condition and subject to demolition or repair (affirmed by the Presidium of the Supreme Court on 29 April 2014)
- Court:
- Supreme Court
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 15 October 2012 № 21-П on the review of constitutionality of para 21 of Art 15 of the Federal law “On the Status of the Military Personnel” in connection with the complaint of citizen N.M.Kabulov
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- Legal issue: whether the contested provisions are constitutional, if their uncertainty allow for depriving of the right to dwelling the citizens dismissed from military service who before 1 January 2005 were registered by the bodies of local self-government as persons in need of dwelling, but subsequently moved to another region for permanent residence and were reregistered there after that date, - as opposed to the citizens of the same category who did not change their place of residence.
Subject areas:
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 30 March 2012 № 9-П on the review of constitutionality of part 2 of Article 4 of the Law of the Russian Federation “On Privatisation of Housing Fund in the Russian Federation” in connection with the complaint of administration of the municipal formation “Zvenigovskii municipal district” of Marii El Republic
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- Legal issue: whether the contested provision, in violation of constitutional principles of equality and rule of law as well as constitutional prohibition against restrictions of rights of local self-government as to independent management of municipal property, does not allow the bodies of local self-government to adopt decisions in the form of a normative act concerning the privatisation of employment-related apartments in the absence of a special regional normative act to that effect.
- Dissenting opinion:
- Zhilin Gennadiy , Kazantsev Sergey
Subject areas:
Have you spotted a typo?
Highlight it, click Ctrl+Enter and send us a message. Thank you for your help!
To be used only for spelling or punctuation mistakes.