Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 16 October 2012 № 22-П on the review of constitutionality of the rules of part 2 of Article 2 and part 1 of Article 32 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation in connection with the complaint of the citizen S.A.Krasnoperov
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- Legal issue: whether part 1 of Article 32 of the Criminal Procedure Code violates the constitutional right to the State protection (including the judicial one) of rights and freedoms as long as this Article precludes the consideration by Russian courts of an application submitted in the procedure of private accusation, concerning the commission by a Russian citizen of a crime against another citizen of Russia outside of the territory of the Russian Federation?
- Dissenting opinion:
- Knyazev Sergey
Subject areas:
Ruling of the Constitutional Court of 28 June 2012 № 1274-О on the complaint of the citizen A.A.Baikulov against the violation of his constitutional rights by paragraphs 2 and 3 of part 2 of Article 30 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- Legal issue: whether there is a violation of the constitutionally guaranteed right of everyone to have his case heard in the court and by the judge within whose competence the case is placed by law, if a person is denied his right to jury trial on the ground that other persons accused within the same criminal case do not have the right to jury trial, so that with regard to them the case must be considered by a panel consisting of three professional judges of a federal court of general jurisdiction?
- Dissenting opinion:
- Aranovskiy Konstantin
Subject areas:
Ruling of the Constitutional Court of 17 January 2012 № 174-О-О on the refusal to accept for consideration the complaint of the citizen Iu.R.Iudin against violation of his constitutional rights by Articles 301 and 312 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation
- Court:
- Constitutional Court
- Legal issue: whether the contested provisions are constitutional, since they do not envisage the right of the convicted person and his advocate to have access to a dissenting opinion of a member of the panel of judges?
- Dissenting opinion:
- Gadzhiev Gadis , Zhilin Gennadiy , Knyazev Sergey , Kleandrov Mikhail
Subject areas:
1
2
Have you spotted a typo?
Highlight it, click Ctrl+Enter and send us a message. Thank you for your help!
To be used only for spelling or punctuation mistakes.