-
Nov 9, 2020
-
Jan 15, 2020In free access for the first time
-
Apr 16, 2017Russian court practice in English
-
Jun 21, 2013“I propose to merge the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation and the Supreme Commercial Court, for which it will be necessary to make amendments to the Constitution of Russia”
-
May 18, 2013"The legal positions formulated by the Presidium and Plenary Session of the Supreme Commercial Court, - they are not only a guidance how to act, but also drafts for future court decisions"
-
Feb 6, 2012“А certain element of “the law of precedent” will serve as a factor of incessant improvement of court”
-
Jul 25, 2014“Theory knows such kind of interpretation as an interpretation contra legem, when a court interprets a law contrary the latter’s literal meaning”
-
Jun 17, 2014“Let us say that we have a super-precedential law. I mean certain “traditions” in judges’ behaviour, certain attitude towards the authority of the superior court”. (Full version)
-
May 22, 2014“It is impossible not to touch upon recently observed attempts of a significant part of legal community to introduce into Russian law-creation practice the elements of the Anglo-Saxon law of precedent”
Subject area
Vladimir Demidov
Interview
-
1.01.2004 | 13:00Vladimir Demidov. Обязательны ли для судей разъяснения постановлений Пленума Верховного Суда РФ? // vsrf.ru. January 2004The explanations on the issues of application of legislation, contained in the decrees of the Plenary Session of the Supreme Court of Russia, based on the requirements of the law and generalized data of judicial practice on the national scale, represent a form of judicial precedent of some kind. They are a reference point, which is subject to an obligatory taking into account for the purposes of delivering lawful, well-grounded and justified sentences, decisions, rulings and judgments. (Full version.)