I cannot agree with the “refusal” definition in the Constitutional Court ruling on the case of citizen Svetlov, since I believe that the question in his appeal is constitutionally significant - an allowance of administrative responsibility (punishment) of persons whose guilt in administrative offence has not been determined by enacted court verdict for an administrative arrest. Immediate fulfillment of administrative arrest in accordance with a ruling, which has no properties of res judicata, causes some serious concerns in its compatibility with the Constitution . Moreover, the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Basic Freedoms is included into the legal system of Russia in accordance with Article 15 (Part 4) of the Russian Constitution, and is given а collisional priority as against the laws. The international legal obligations of Russia, originating from its Article 3, Point 3, demand that Presumption of Innocence is maintained not only in the cases of criminal, but also in the cases of administrative responsibility.