Interviews

The introduction of judicial precedents will, of course, influence in a positive way the uniformity of solving the disputes of the same type by courts. There should not be such thing as solving disputes of the same type in different ways by courts and even judges of the same court. (Full version.)

If in the modern Russia precedent will displace constitutional norm, there will be neither Constitution nor precedent. (Full version.)

The main task of the Supreme Commercial Court – the formulation of legal opinions, having significance for the development of law, in other words, the creation of precedents. (Full version.)

I always believed that the system of precedent helps to reduce corruption in courts. (Full version.)

In the conditions of chaotically changing legislation the law of precedent is in fact the only protection from the arbitrariness of legislators. (Full version.)

The Russian judicial system exists for less than 20 years, and therefore it is essentially impossible to encompass everything by precedent. (Full version.)

In my view, the approaches to the application of legislation worked out by the Plenary Session of the Supreme Commercial Court constitute acts of official interpretation, have important significance for courts as well as participants of economic relations. (Full version.)