• A
  • A
  • A
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Regular version of the site

Interviews

Anton Ivanov. Судам доверяют больше, чем раньше // arbitr.ru. February 2011

The common law countries apply the law of precedent through centuries, and nobody believes that this approach affects the independence of a judge. (Full version.)

Valeria Adamova. 15 лет Федеральному арбитражному суду Московского округа: актуальные вопросы текущей деятельности и дальнейшие перспективы развития // Гарант. September 2010

The introduction of judicial precedents will, of course, influence in a positive way the uniformity of solving the disputes of the same type by courts. There should not be such thing as solving disputes of the same type in different ways by courts and even judges of the same court. (Full version.)

Tamara Morshchakova. Прецедент: подсказка или указка? [Precedent: A Tip or An Order? // ЭЖ-Юрист. 26.04.2010

Valery Zorkin. Выступление Председателя КС РФ // ksrf.ru. April 2010

If in the modern Russia precedent will displace constitutional norm, there will be neither Constitution nor precedent. (Full version.)

Anton Ivanov. Тонкая судебная настройка // arbitr.ru. March 2010

The main task of the Supreme Commercial Court – the formulation of legal opinions, having significance for the development of law, in other words, the creation of precedents. (Full version.)

Anton Ivanov. Итоги работы Высшего Арбитражного Суда РФ за 2009 год и стратегия развития арбитражной системы РФ // Гарант. November 2009

I always believed that the system of precedent helps to reduce corruption in courts. (Full version.)

Anton Ivanov. Технологии меняют общество к лучшему // Forbes. October 2009

In the conditions of chaotically changing legislation the law of precedent is in fact the only protection from the arbitrariness of legislators. (Full version.)

Artur Absaliamov. Налоговые споры: тенденции арбитражной практики // Гарант. September 2008

The Russian judicial system exists for less than 20 years, and therefore it is essentially impossible to encompass everything by precedent. (Full version.)

Igor Strelov. ВАС остается за главного // ЭЖ-Юрист. Май 2008

In my view, the approaches to the application of legislation worked out by the Plenary Session of the Supreme Commercial Court constitute acts of official interpretation, have important significance for courts as well as participants of economic relations. (Full version.)

Anton Ivanov. Итоги работы Высшего Арбитражного Суда Российской Федерации и перспективы развития арбитражного правосудия на ближайшее время // Гарант. April 2008

In general I share the view of those who are inclined to gradually lend to the decisions of our courts the role of precedent. (Full version.)